God is love. That is the basic premise on which I build my life. Even when I feel nothing and doubt everything, I know that I am loved.
Except, it isn’t exactly that easy, is it?
I was talking to a friend of mine, M, who’s losing her faith. Slowly, to be sure, but bit-by-bit she’s letting go. The Protestant megachurches she attends are fake, and she feels she is too. I admitted that sometimes all I have is the knowledge that God loves me.
She said, “But I don’t know that for sure. I don’t have proof.”
And all I could say was, “Really?”
Proof. Do I have proof? Well, I think so. I have had many answered prayers, both tangible and not. But I don’t keep track, I don’t write them all down on a list of evidence. (Maybe I should.) But when challenged, I’m dreadfully unprepared.
“I mean of course, there is the Bible,” she continued, “but that is only proof if you believe already. I don’t feel anything, so there goes that.”
“Never an answered prayer? Never that sense of warmth, of blessedness?” No unexpected sunshine when you’re cold, no brightly-colored flowers by the sidewalk on a dreary, depressing day? Has she never plead for help and had it arrive? Nothing?
“Answered prayers aren’t proof. That’s like looking at the sky and asking it to rain. If it does, did it rain because you wanted it to?”
You know what? Yeah. A little bit, yeah, it did! Say my mother is ambivalent on taking the scenic route versus the highway and plans to pick whichever has the least traffic, and say I ask her to take the prettier path. Say she does. Then, yes. She might have driven past the lake anyway, but it’s still a gift to me. It’s still a blessing.
“But rain isn’t enough to get me to believe in something like that.” Stinker!
I mentioned this conversation to an Orthodox friend, who basically said that M and I are speaking different languages. For one thing, every individual Protestant more or less makes up their own doctrine. So I need to understand what she believes before we can completely communicate about faith––especially since Protestants have some really strange assumptions that lead to some wacky doctrines. For another, “Western faith is based on intellect, whereas Orthodox faith is based in the heart.”
M says her faith is intellect-based because she has no feelings to substantiate it. (I rather think that if she did she’d just tell herself she was fooling herself, but I’m feeling rather dry and snarky at present.) She claims she’d accept feelings of love as proof if she had them.
So, me being the smart-aleck that I tend to be, asked her how she’d want God to show His love for her. And she, being the smart-aleck that she is, replied, “A little note on my bed-side table would be convenient.”
But I don’t actually think that sort of proof would be a good thing. I think faith has to be a personal thing, a gift we give based on our personal relationship with God and on our free will to choose how we live our life and what we believe. Now, there have been some really stellar examples of God giving someone a wake-up call. Saint Paul is one of my favorites. “Do I have your attention now?” Even so, there’s still the element of choice. Saint Paul could’ve gone, “Nope, lemme just go torture some more Christians and I’ll call you back later.” He didn’t, thank heavens, but he had that option. But if there were some sort of impersonal, objective, undeniable proof of God’s existence, then how would there be faith?
As for my Orthodox friend’s final suggestion? “Hey, maybe you could take her to a Greek fest sometime. Dancing, music, food––if that is not an expression of God’s love, what is?”
Thoughts?


